KONTRADIKSI KEBIJAKAN INDUSTRI KREATIF DAN USAHA PELESTARIAN KESENIAN TRADISI (Kasus Seni Pertunjukan Luambek)

Authors

  • Irfan Kurniawan Universitas Pgri Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36982/jsdb.v1i2.126

Abstract

Arrival of social change comes as a result of the process of industrializationand globalization of information, if viewed from all aspects, influenced by such changes. One aspect is the art, from the influence of these changes, the art began to shift toward commercial dimension of art. So is the case in government policy on the development and preservation of art and culture, also insists on the principle of industrial and creative economy. The policy on the one hand, has a positive impact (in economic terms), but on the other hand also have a negative impact, namely the commercialization, commodification, and profane without considering the cultural assumptions. resulting in a decline in ethical values and aesthetic, and neglect the development and preservation of ritual art tradition in the context of the natural cultural community, because they are not going to bring benefits in terms of economy and creative industries.such as the deterioration condition of art performances luambek in Pariaman Minangkabau society. Contradictions creative industries policy and conservation efforts in the arts need special attention by the relevant parties, especially in preparing the formula the preservation of traditional art concepts in the context of supporting the community.

 Keyword: contradiction, creative industries and traditional arts

Author Biography

Irfan Kurniawan, Universitas Pgri Palembang

Program Studi Sendratasik

References

Ardike, I Wayan. 2000. Hubungan Arkeologi dengan Pariwisata Indonesia.Denpasar: UniversitasUdayana.

Hartoko, Dick. 1984. Manusia dan Seni. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Kanisius.

Herkovits, Melville J. 1956. Man and His Works. New York: AA. Knopf.

HAMKA, 1968. Adat Minangkabau dan Hartanya: Menggali Hukum Tanah dan Hukum Waris di Minangkabau. Padang: Sri Dharma.

Kayam, Umar. 2000. Pertunjukan Rakyat Tradisional Jawa dan Perubahan, dalam buku Ketika Orang Jawa Nyeni, Ahimsa (ed) Yogyakarta: Galang Pres. 2000.

Kamal, Zahara. 2010.“Eksistensi Seni Pertunjukan Luambek Dalam Kehidupan Sosial Masyarakat Nagari Kepala Hilalang Kecamatan 2 x 11 Kayu Tanam Kabupaten Padang Pariaman.â€Tesis. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Kleden, Ignas. 1988.Sikap Ilmiah dan Kritik Kebudayaan. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Mursal Esten, 1994. “Arti Tradisi dalam Perkembangan Kebudayaan.†Pidato Ilmiah. Padang: IKIP.

Malinowski, B. 1964. “The Functional Theory of Culture†dalam Setangkai Bunga Sosiologi. Ed. Selo Sumardjan. Jakarta: FEUI.

Subadjo, Haryati. 1991. “Kepribadian Budaya Bangsa†dalam Kepribadian Budaya Bangsa. Ed. Ayorohaedi. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Supriadi, Dedi. 1994.Kreativitas, Kebudayaan, dan Perkembangan IPTEK.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Salim, Djohan.tt. “Industri Kreatif dan Pendidikan Tinggi Seni.†Makalah. Yogyakarta: ISI Yogyakarta.

Studi Pemetaan Industri Kreatif, Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia, 2007

Saputra, Wiko. 2010. Industri Kreatif. Cetakan Pertama. Baduose Media.Sedyawati, Edi. 1981. Pertumbuhan Seni Pertunjukan. Jakarta: SinarHarapan.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles