Orientasi Kewirausahaan untuk Mencapai Competitive Advantage pada Usaha Kecil Menengah di Banyuasin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36982/jiegmk.v9i2.560Abstrak
Abstract
This study examines entrepreneurial orientation towards the competitive advantage of small and medium enterprises. The population of this study was small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Banyuasin District as many as 53,265 SMEs. By using the Slovin method with a precision level of 10%, the study sample was 100 SMEs. The data used is sourced from primary data, this primary data is obtained directly through the distribution of questionnaires. As the respondents are the managers or those responsible for the company. The purpose of this study is to see how entrepreneurial orientation has an impact on MSEs competitive advantage. As a result, entrepreneurial orientation is done by improving marketing strategy quality innovation, proactive willingness, business risk-taking skills, and high futility, while competing with innovative capabilities. production and marketing management. Therefore if the entrepreneur wants to have a competitive advantage, the entrepreneur must have an entrepreneurial orientation seriously and effectively so that he can overcome the competition between SMEs. This was evidenced by the results of the average SPSS entrepreneurial orientation level of 8.7500 and the average competitive advantage level of 8.7800. the basis of this identification is less than 50 meaning entrepreneurial orientation has an impact on competitive advantage in a company, then the R-Square value of 0.549 means that the existence of an entrepreneurial orientation can affect competitive advantage. This finding illustrates that SMEs in the area that have implemented entrepreneurial orientation are able to respond to environmental changes through the application of a good entrepreneurial orientation so that they can survive.
Keywords : Entrepreneurial orientation, Competitive advantage
Abstrak
Penelitian ini menguji orientasi kewirausahaan terhadap keunggulan bersaing usaha kecil menengah. Populasi penelitian ini adalah usaha kecil menengah (UKM) di Kabupaten Banyuasin sebanyak 53.265 UKM. Dengan menggunakan metode Slovin dengan tingkat presisi 10% maka sampel penelitiannya sebanyak 100 UMK. Data yang digunakan bersumber dari data primer, data primer ini diperoleh secara langsung melalui penyebaran kuesioner Sebagai responden adalah para manajer atau penanggung jawab perusahaan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini ingin melihat bagaimana orientasi kewirausahaan berdampak pada keunggulan bersaing UMK. Hasilnya, Orientasi kewirausahaan dilakukan dengan meningkatkan inovasi kualitas strategi pemasaran, kemauan proaktif, ketrampilan mengambil risiko bisnis, serta mempunyai futurity yang tinggi, sedangkan keunggulan bersaing dilakukan dengan meningkatkan kapabilitas inovatif, manajemen produksi dan pemasaran. Oleh karena itu jika pengusaha ingin memilki competitive advantage maka pengusaha harus memiliki orientasi kewirausahaan secara serius dan efektif sehingga dapat mengatasi persaingan antar UKM. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengan hasil olah SPSS rata-rata tingkat orientasi kewirausahaan sebesar 8.7500 dan rata-rata tingkat keunggulan bersaing sebesar 8.7800. dasar identifikasi ini nilainya kurang dari 50 artinya orientasi kewirausahaan memberikan dampak pada keunggulan bersaing pada sebuah perusahaan, selanjutnya diperoleh nilai R-Square sebesar 0.549 artinya dengan adanya orientasi wirausaha maka dapat mempengaruhi keunggulan bersaing. Temuan ini memberikan gambaran bahwa UKM di daerah tersebut yang telah menerapkan orientasi kewirausahaan mampu merespons perubahan lingkungan melalui penerapan orientasi kewirausahaan yang baik sehingga mampu bertahan.
Kata kunci : Orientasi kewirausahaan, Keunggulan Bersaing
Referensi
Abidin, N. Z., Adros, N. A., & Hassan, H. 2014. Competitive strategy and performance of quantity surveying firms in Malaysia. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 19(2), 15–32.
Bajwa, S. U., Kitchlew, N., Rehman, K. U., & Assistant, N. K. 2017. What is Entrepreneurship, in Entrepreneurship Research? The Definitional Issue as Barrier to the Advancement of Field. Jurnal Management & Organizational Studies, 6(2), 74–96.
Becherer, R. C., & Helms, M. M. 2016. The role of entrepreneurial marketing in improving market share for small businesses facing external environmental or resource challenges. Journal of Business & Entrepreneurship, 27(2), 119–147.
Breuer, H., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. 2018. Values-Based Business Model Innovation: A Toolkit (pp. 395–416). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_18
Bps Sumsel, 2017. Data hasil Pendaftaran perusahaan Sensus Ekonomi 2017 Provinsi Sumatera Selatan
Carayannis, E. G. (2017). Palgrave Studies in Democracy , Innovation , and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. C. 2007. Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Theory and Perspective, (May), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_3
Chakravorty, U., Liu, R., & Tang, R. 2017. Firm Innovation under Import Competition from Low-Wage Countries.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(75–78), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
Gao, Y., Ge, B., Lang, X., & Xu, X. 2018. Impacts of proactive orientation and entrepreneurial strategy on entrepreneurial performance: An empirical research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135(November), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.019
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Tharchen, T. 2017. Performativity as ongoing journeys : Implications for strategy , entrepreneurship , and innovation. Long Range Planning, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.003
Gautam, B. K., Henderson, G., & Wang, C. 2017. Strategy Formation in Entrepreneurial Settings: Past Insights and Future Directions. Strategic Management Journal, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12041
Gupta, V. K. 2016. Strategic framework for managing forces of continuity and change in innovation and risk management in service sector : a study of service industry in India. Int. J. Services and Operations Managem, 23(1), 1–17.
Hooi, H. C., Ahmad, N. H., Amran, A., & Rahman, S. A. 2016. The functional role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage in ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1616–1638. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2015-0144
Ismail, M. D., Isa, A. M., Alam, S. S., & Ahmad, M. 2016. Market orientation , entrepreneurship orientation , relationship commitment and communication among SME exporters in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 1(1), 19–28. Retrieved from https://www.emich.edu/regents/meetings/2015/meeting061615/section1761615.pdf
Jong, J. de, & Wennekrs, S. 2008. Intrapreneurship Conceptualizing entrepreneurial employee behaviour. The Journal of Business Strategy, 12(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039227
Kant, R., Jaiswal, D., & Mishra, S. 2017. The Investigation of Service Quality Dimensions , Customer Satisfaction and Corporate Image in Indian Public Sector Banks : An Application of Structural Equation Model ( SEM ). Sage Publications, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916681256
Kantur, D. 2016. Strategic entrepreneurship: mediating the entrepreneurial orientation-performance link. Management Decision, 54(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2014-0660
Kisaka, S. E., & Anthony, M. 2014. An Analysis of the Presence of an Entrepreneurial Culture in Kenya : An Application of the Population Ecology Theory and the Resource Dependence Theory. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(15), 184–192.
Kraus, S., & Rigtering, C. 2017. Strategic corporate entrepreneurship: a configuration approach-based case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 9(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2017.10004994
Lau, T. L. M., Shaffer, M. A., Chan, K. F., & Man, T. W. Y. 2012. The entrepreneurial behaviour inventory: A simulated incident method to assess corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 18(6), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211268120
Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. 2014. Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612455034
Lee, Y. S. 2016. Entrepreneurship, small businesses and economic growth in cities. Journal of Economic Geography, lbw021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw021
Li, L., Jiang, F., Pei, Y., & Jiang, N. 2017. Entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance success : The contingency role of relational factors. Journal of Business Research, 72, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.011
Lisi, G. 2017. Entrepreneurial earnings and entrepreneurial choice in a search and matching model of the labor market. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 29(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2017.1289649
Luke, B., Kearins, K., & Verreynne, M. 2011. Developing a conceptual framework of strategic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(3), 314–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551111130736
Mcluskie, P. 2017. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2016-0181
Miller, D. 1983. The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2017. Sources of Entrepreneurial Courage and Imagination: Three Perspectives, Three Contexts. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(5), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12281
Nwachukwu, C., Chládková, H., & Žufan, P. 2017. the Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Entrepreneurial Competencies, Entrepreneurial Leadership, and Firm Performance: a Proposed Model. The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Entrepreneurial Competencies, Entrepreneurial Leadership, And Firm Performance: A Proposed Model Chijioke, 7(1), 3–16.
Ott, T. E., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. 2017. Strategy Formation in Entrepreneurial Settings: Past Insights and Future Directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journa, 325(1469). https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1257
OTT, T. E., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. 2017. Strategy Formation in Entrepreneurial Settings: Past Insights and Future Directions. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12441
Papulova, E., & Papulova, Z. 2006. Competitive Strategy and Competitive Advantage of Small and MIdsized Manufacturing Enterprises in Slovakia. E-Leader, Slovakia, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054287
Porter, M. E. 1987. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43. https://doi.org/Article
Porter, M. E. 2011. The Competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 2(202), 96–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327000em0101_4
Puspasari, E. L., & Rahardjo, S. T. 2017. Pengaruh Orientasi Kewirausahaan, Inovasi Produk, dan Dukungan Partner Terhadap Keunggulan Bersaing. Diponegoro Journal of Management, 6, 1–8.
Raheem, S., Oyelola, O. ., & Oresanya, O. 2014. Business Revolution through Corporate Entreprenuership. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Developmen, 5, 52–62.
Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. 2018. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the mediating role of functional performances. Management Research Review, 41(7), 878–900. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0092
Rodrigues, M. G., & José, F. 2015. Technology and Competitiveness: Technological Innovation for Developing Economies Growth. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 4(4), 57–65.
Schäfer, D., Stephan, A., & Mosquera, J. S. 2017. Family ownership: does it matter for funding and success of corporate innovations? Small Business Economics, 48(4), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9813-y
Stambaugh, J. E., Martinez, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Kataria, N. 2017. How well do EO measures and entrepreneurial behavior match ? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0432-5
Veliyath, R., & Fitzgerald, E. 2000. Firm capabilities bunisness strategies, customer preference, and hypercompetitive arenas : The sustainability of competitive advantages with implications for firm competitiveness. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 10(1), 56–82.
Wang, T., Thornhill, S., & De Dastro, J. 2017. Entrepreneurial orientation, legitimation, and new venture performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(4), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631234104.2002.00001.x
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance : a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Â
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Â
LP2M Indo Global Mandiri University has the right to multiply and distribute the article and every author is not allowed to publish the same article that has been published in this journal.
