Penerapan New Public Management di Pendidikan Tinggi Studi Kasus di STIA & P Annisa Dwi Salfaritzi Palembang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v9i3.3641Keywords:
Application, Public Management, New Public Management, Higher EducationAbstract
New Public Management offers a different perspective to improve public sector performance by adopting the work spirit of the private sector which prioritizes the values of efficiency and effectiveness. This problem gave rise to the idea of how to implement new public management in higher education by taking a case study at the Annisa Dwi Salfarizi College of Administration and Government in Palembang. This research aims to determine the application of new public management in higher education, especially at the Annisa Dwi Salfarizi College of Administration and Government, Palembang. The method used in this research is research with a qualitative approach, namely building arguments to obtain and sort data as well as interpret and conclude data findings. The data in this research was collected through observation and interviews. The results of the research were that the Annisa Dwi Salfarizi Palembang College of Administration and Government carried out face-to-face lectures using power points, tuition payments were still made manually, and KRS was filled out in writing rather than using an integrated system. system. Academic activity information services are announced through information posted on the notice board, so students must always check the notice board regularly and must come to campus if they want to find out information about lectures. Conclusion: The implementation of New Public Management in Higher Education using case studies at the Annisa Dwi Salfarizi College of Administration and Government in Palembang does not appear to have been implemented optimally.
References
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238
Capano, G., & Pritoni, A. (2019). Varieties of hybrid systemic governance in European Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12180
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.
Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher education, 62, 665-683.
Ewalt, & Jo, A. (2001). Theories of governance and New Public Management: Links to Understanding Welfare Policy Implementation. The Annual Conference of the American Society for Public Administration.
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. Oxford University Press.
Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2000). National policies concerning the economic role of higher education. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00009-X
Hood, C. (1991). Public Administration For All Season? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
Hood, C. (1995a). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000208
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The Government of Risk. New York: Oxford University Press.
Keban, Y. T. (2004). Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: konsep, teori dan isu. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A., & Torka, M. (2021). Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions. In Towards a Multiversity? https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839404683-001
Mahmudi, M. (2003). New Public Management (NPM): Pendekatan Baru Manajemen Sektor Publik. Sinergi, 6(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.20885/sinergi.vol6.iss1.art5
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3 ed.). Sage Publication.
Neave, G. (2003). The Bologna declaration: Some of the historic dilemmas posed by the reconstruction of the community in Europe’s systems of higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802239290
Olsen, J. P. (2009). Democratic government, institutional autonomy and the dynamics of change. West European Politics, 32(3), 439–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380902779048
Olsen, J. P. (2015). of the ( European ) University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1
Pasciana, R., Iriany, I. S., & Muhtadi, A. H. (2024). Efektivitas Pelayanan Berbasis Online Sistem Antrian Terpadu ( SISTER ) di Plasa Telkom Garut. Jurnal pemerintahan dan politik Universitas Indo Global Mandiri, 9(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.uigm.ac.id/index.php/PDP/article/view/3722
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public Management Reform A Comparative Analisis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riwukore, J. R., Habaora, F., & Terttiaavini, T. (2022). Good Governance Dalam Mengukur Kinerja Lembaga Negara (Review). Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v7i1.1974
Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher education, 48(4), 483-510.
