Pendekatan Thinking Across dalam Dynamic Governance: Strategi Efektif untuk Mewujudkan Gerakan Sumsel Mandiri Pangan (GSMP)

Authors

  • Atrika Iriani Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Sena Putra Prabujaya Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Siti Zubaidah STIA Bala Putra Dewa
  • Een Endasari STIA Bala Putra Dewa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v10i1.4687

Keywords:

Thinking Across, Dynamic Governance, GSMP, Food Resilience, Cross-Sectoral Collaboration, Adaptive Governance

Abstract

Gerakan Sumsel Mandiri Pangan (GSMP) adalah inisiatif strategis dari Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Selatan untuk mencapai ketahanan pangan berkelanjutan melalui pemberdayaan masyarakat dan optimalisasi sumber daya lokal. Namun, pelaksanaan program ini menghadapi berbagai tantangan, seperti kurang optimalnya sosialisasi, minimnya pendampingan lapangan, serta bantuan yang belum sepenuhnya disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan lokal. Pendekatan Thinking Across dalam kerangka Dynamic Governance menawarkan solusi strategis untuk menghadapi tantangan ini melalui kolaborasi lintas sektor, inovasi kebijakan, dan tata kelola yang adaptif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan eksploratif, mengumpulkan data melalui wawancara terstruktur, observasi, dan analisis dokumen dari para pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat dalam GSMP. Analisis data menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan Thinking Across meningkatkan efektivitas program dengan mendorong sinergi antara pemerintah, sektor swasta, dan masyarakat. Pendekatan ini memungkinkan integrasi perspektif beragam dan pengetahuan lokal, menjadikan program lebih adaptif terhadap perubahan lingkungan dan dinamika sosial-ekonomi. Selain itu, pendekatan ini memperkuat partisipasi masyarakat dan memastikan intervensi program selaras dengan kebutuhan lokal. Dengan mengedepankan pemikiran lintas sektor dan strategi dinamis, penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan teori tata kelola adaptif di sektor pangan. Rekomendasi meliputi peningkatan sosialisasi program, pendampingan teknis yang lebih terarah, dan pengambilan kebijakan berbasis data untuk memaksimalkan dampak GSMP dalam mencapai ketahanan dan kemandirian pangan.

Author Biographies

Atrika Iriani, Universitas Sriwijaya

Prodi Administrasi Publik

Sena Putra Prabujaya, Universitas Sriwijaya

Prodi Administrasi Publik

References

Aditya, R. B., & Zakiah, A. (2022). Practical Reflection and Benefits of Making a Food Garden at Home During Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Food Studies, 11(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/11.1.2022.a8

Akhmaddhian, S., & Hartiwiningsih, H. (2018). The public participation in water conservation to embody food security in Kuningan, Indonesia. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(4), 254–264. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046351509&partnerID=40&md5=268727f08c40a65ffec3dfcc8390189a

Alonso, C. (2015). Artistic practices, discursive contexts and environmental humanities in the age of the anthropocene. Artnodes, 2015(15), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i15.2579

Anthony, S., Iriani, A., & Nofrima, S. (2024). Dynamic Governance in the Thinking Ahead Dimension: Perspectives on the Implementation of the South Sumatra Mandiri Food Movement Program. GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta), 5(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v5i1.398

Basseches, M. (1986). Comments on social cognition in adulthood: A dialectical perspective. Educational Gerontology, 12(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0380127860120407

Basuki, N. (2023). Mengoptimalkan Modal Manusia : Strategi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Yang Efektif Untuk. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 4(2), 182–192.

Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., & Setiadi, N. (2014). New challenges for adaptive urban governance in highly dynamic environments: Revisiting planning systems and tools for adaptive and strategic planning. Urban Climate, 7, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.01.006

Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Thinking Across cultures: Implications for dual processes. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0010

Djelic, Marie-Laure, K. S.-A. (2021). Institutional dynamics of regulation Marie-Laure Djelic and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. Interactions, 1–38.

Entwistle, N. (2005). Learning outcomes and ways of Thinking Across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517042000336818

Evans, D. (2004). Shifting the balance of power?: UK public health policy and capacity building. Critical Public Health, 14(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000310001658789

Faircloth, C., & Gürtin, Z. B. (2018). Fertile Connections: Thinking Across Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Parenting Culture Studies. Sociology, 52(5), 983–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517696219

Fang, Z., Jung, W. H., Korczykowski, M., Luo, L., Prehn, K., Xu, S., Detre, J. A., Kable, J. W., Robertson, D. C., & Rao, H. (2017). Post-conventional moral reasoning is associated with increased ventral striatal activity at rest and during task. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07115-w

Flood management and nature-can rewilding help? (2016). Ecos, 37(1), 32–42. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029456852&partnerID=40&md5=7b990d952e94449e8696cfee4f1195e8

Galaz, V., & Duit, A. (2008). Governance and Complexity--Emerging Issues for Governance Theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335.

Gray, S. A. O., Jones, C. W., Theall, K. P., Glackin, E., & Drury, S. S. (2017). Thinking Across Generations: Unique Contributions of Maternal Early Life and Prenatal Stress to Infant Physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(11), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.09.001

Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2014). Dynamic Governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation and Governance, 8(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12005

Idrus, I. A., Suryono, A., Noor, I., & Amin, F. (2023). Education Policy Innovation in Dynamic Governance Perspective in North Luwu District Education Programs. Social Science Journal, 13. https://resmilitaris.net/menu-script/index.php/resmilitaris/article/view/2366

Irish, M., Addis, D. R., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2012). Considering the role of semantic memory in episodic future thinking: Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain, 135(7), 2178–2191. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws119

Jackson, L., & Sojot, A. N. (2023). So much more than research: Learning from women leaders in philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(9), 1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2106851

Juchem Neto, J. P., & Delamare, A. F. S. (2021). The level of tolerance of individuals, individual thinking, and the formation of social norms. Journal of Computational Social Science, 4(2), 721–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00106-y

Kencana, N., Putra, R., & Permatasari, Y. (2024). Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Palembang melalui Sister City: Tantangan dan Hambatan. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 9(4), 323–330.

Khairul Fahmi Purba, Muhammad Yazid, Mery Hasmeda, Dessy Adriani, M. F. T. (2021). The Sustainability ff Rice Farming Practices in Tidal Swamplands Of South Sumatra Indonesia. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences Potravinarstvo, 15(November 2020), 9–17.

Lane, D., & Sorby, S. (2022). Bridging the gap: blending spatial skills instruction into a technology teacher preparation programme. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2195–2215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09691-5

MacFall, J., Lelekacs, J. M., LeVasseur, T., Moore, S., & Walker, J. (2015). Toward resilient food systems through increased agricultural diversity and local sourcing in the Carolinas. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0321-1

MacLachlan, M., & Scherer, M. J. (2018). Systems thinking for assistive technology: a commentary on the GREAT summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1472306

Markell, D. L., & Glicksman, R. L. (2016). Dynamic Governance in Theory and Application, Part I. SSRN Electronic Journal, 791. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2734304

Nadal, A., & Nazar-Beutelspacher, D. A. (2023). COVID-19: Solidarity initiatives for food security in the Mayan indigenous region of south-southeast Mexico. Global Food Security, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100697

Naami, M. A., & Maemunah, M. (2024). Efektivitas Program Sibakul Jogja dalam Pemberdayaan Mitra UMKM di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 9(3), 212–219.

Natsir, N., Halim, R., & Tahili, M. H. (2023). THE EFFECT OF DYNAMIC GOVERNANCE ON PUBLIC SERVICE INNOVATION THROUGH THE RECRUITMENT OF MANAGERS OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS. Public Policy and Administration, 22(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-23-22-4-02

Oh, I. (2010). Virtual technology marketing and governance problems: How can firms benefit from dynamic boundaries? International Journal of Technology Marketing, 5(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2010.035692

Palanica, A., Lyons, A., Cooper, M., Lee, A., & Fossat, Y. (2019). A comparison of nature and urban environments on creative Thinking Across different levels of reality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.006

Peacock, M., Bissell, P., & Owen, J. (2014). Dependency denied: Health inequalities in the neo-liberal era. Social Science and Medicine, 118(C), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 16 Mei 2005. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2005 Nomor 41. Jakarta.

Potter, L. (2018). How can the people’s sovereignty be achieved in the oil palm sector? Is the plantation model shifting in favour of smallholders? Land and Development in Indonesia, 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814762106-019

Pritchard, J., & Baillie, C. (2006). How can engineering education contribute to a sustainable future? International Journal of Phytoremediation, 31(5), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600797350

Raak, R. van. (2017). Transition policies:Connecting System Dynamics, Governance and Instruments in an Application to Dutch Healthcare. In Young people and contradictions of inclusion. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t894p0.9

Rivki, M., Bachtiar, A. M., Informatika, T., Teknik, F., & Indonesia, U. K. (2017). Ensuring Food Security and Reducing Poverty through Gender on Development: Indonesian Case. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 112.

Salsabila, L., Ariany, R., & Koeswara, H. (2024). Fostering Community-Led Waste Management Through Dynamic Governance: A Case Study of Batam City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.187-200

Sands, C., Duran, N., Christoph, L., & Stewart, C. (2018). Phoenix Rising: The Evolution of Holyoke’s Collaborative Organizing for Healthy Food Resilience. Health Promotion Practice, 19(1_suppl), 63S-69S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918788849

Schoon, M., York, A., Sullivan, A., & Baggio, J. (2017). The emergence of an environmental governance network: the case of the Arizona borderlands. Regional Environmental Change, 17(3), 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1060-x

Seminar, A., Sarwoprasodjo, S., & Kinseng, R. (2018). Peasant Understanding of Food Sovereignty: Indonesian Peasants in a Transnational Agrarian Movement. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 22(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1250918

Siborutorop, J. (2023). Analysis of Indonesia’s National Food Estate Programme from a Food Sovereignty-based Perspective. Jurnal Politik Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics), 9(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpi.v9i2.44430

Smith, M. K., Walsh, C., Holmes, N. G., & Summers, M. M. (2019). Using the Ecology and Evolution-Measuring Achievement and Progression in Science assessment to measure student Thinking Across the Four-Dimensional Ecology Education framework. Ecosphere, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2873

Thompson, C. (2011). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: Process over Output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), p4.

Voß, J.-P. (2007). Designs on governance. In Development.

Wanto, H. S. (2023). Sustainable agricultural policy strategy through increasing food crop productivity in Indonesia. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(2), 223–228. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160030864&partnerID=40&md5=da23ae19614c2e0d95078ba9a2e4776b

Merna T. dan F. F. Al-Thani. 2008. Corporate Risk Management. 2nd ed. John Welly and Sons Ltd. England.

Samsi, N. 2012. Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Independensi, dan Kompetensi terhadap Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan dengan kepatuhan Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Tesis. Program S2 Akuntansi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA). Surabaya.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-18

How to Cite

Iriani, A., Putra Prabujaya, S., Zubaidah, S., & Endasari, E. (2025). Pendekatan Thinking Across dalam Dynamic Governance: Strategi Efektif untuk Mewujudkan Gerakan Sumsel Mandiri Pangan (GSMP). Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 10(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v10i1.4687

Issue

Section

Articles
external-statistic-user-interface-budi-arianto Abstract views: 997 / PDF downloads: 862