The Politics of Mining and Religion: Argumentative Conflict Between Gusdurian and PBNU from the Perspective of Antonio Gramsci's Hegemony
Politik Tambang dan Agama: Konflik Argumentasi Antara Gusdurian dan PBNU dalam Perspektif Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v11i3.6946Keywords:
Politics, Hegemony, Mining, NU, GusdurianAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the argumentative conflict between the Nahdlatul Ulama Executive Board (PBNU) and the Gusdurian Network in the polemic over mining management policy through the perspective of Antonio Gramsci's hegemony, focusing on the use of religious authority, Islamic discourse, and institutional legitimacy as instruments of ideological contestation in the public sphere.
Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a qualitative approach based on literature review and comparative studies. Data sources included official statements, published articles, and online media texts from both actors. The analysis was conducted in three stages: identification of argumentative positions, comparative paradigm analysis, and application of Gramsci's hegemony categories.
Findings: PP No. 25 of 2024, Article 83A, represents a practice of ideological domination based on a development narrative. PBNU legitimizes mining through the discourse of the public good and Islamic jurisprudence, thus constructing a new common sense that aligns mining with Islamic values. Gusdurian challenges this through ecological critique and social justice arguments. Within Gramsci's framework, PBNU functions as a traditional intellectual group aligned with the state's hegemonic bloc, while Gusdurian operates as an organic intellectual group building an alternative historical bloc, a war of positions over the meaning of Islamic ethics and the public good.
Practical Implication: This research encourages the public to be more critical of politically motivated religious narratives.
Originality/value: This research's originality lies in the combination of Gramsci's hegemonic perspective with the dynamics of mining policy polemics in the context of Indonesian Islamic organizations.
Paper type: Review Paper
References
Abdalla, U. A. (2024a). Tulisan Ulil Abshar Abdalla, Seri Pertama: Soal Tambang dan Fikih Lingkungan. Islami[Dot]Co. https://islami.co/tulisan-ulil-abshar-abdalla-seri-pertama-soal-tambang-dan-fikih-lingkungan/
Abdalla, U. A. (2024b, June 19). Isu Tambang, Antara Ideologi dan Fikih. kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2024/06/19/isu-tambang-antara-ideologi-dan-fikih
Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. SUKA Press.
Admin KBK. News. (2023). Kerusakan Lingkungan Akibat Tambang dan Pembatatan Hutan di Kalimantan Makin Memprihatinkan. Kantor Berita Kalimantan. https://kbk.news/kerusakan-lingkungan-akibat-tambang-dan-pembatatan-hutan-di-kalimantan-makin-memprihatinkan/
Afrijal, A., Helmi, H., Latif, I. R., & Usman, B. (2023). Penguatan Etika Pemerintahan sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintahan. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 8(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v8i4.3416
Ali, Z. Z. (2017). PEMIKIRAN HEGEMONI ANTONIO GRAMSCI (1891- 1937) DI ITALIA. JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama Dan Kemanusiaan, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24235/jy.v3i2.5482
Antonio Gramsci. (1992). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Quintin Hoare & Geoffrey Nowell Smith, Trans.). International Publisher.
Aranditio, S. (2024, June 6). PBNU Klaim Tambang Mereka Ramah Lingkungan. kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2024/06/06/pbnu-klaim-tambang-mereka-ramah-lingkungan
Ardi, A. A., Muliyani, M., Usman, U., & Amaludin, R. (2024). Dampak Aktivitas Pertambangan terhadap Pola Pikir dan Perilaku Beragama di Kawasan Pertambangan Morosi. Satwika : Kajian Ilmu Budaya Dan Perubahan Sosial, 8(1), Article 1. (Sosial Budaya). https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v8i1.31070
Arif Maftuhin. (2024, July 16). Roundtable ‘Fikih Tambang’. Arif Maftuhin. https://www.maftuh.in/2024/07/roundtable-fikih-tambang.html
Devteo Mahardika. (2024). Sejumlah Kiai Kritik Sikap PBNU Terima Konsensi Tambang Batu Bara. https://www.detik.com/jabar/cirebon-raya/d-7532261/sejumlah-kiai-kritik-sikap-pbnu-terima-konsensi-tambang-batu-bara
Erman, E. (2017). AKTOR, AKSES DAN POLITIK LINGKUNGAN DI PERTAMBANGAN TIMAH BANGKA. Masyarakat Indonesia, 36(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v36i2.640
Fahmi, R. (2024, June 11). Balada Konsesi Tambang NU, Antara Kebutuhan dan Kritikan. STAIM LUMAJANG. https://staimlumajang.ac.id/balada-konsesi-tambang-nu-antara-kebutuhan-dan-kritikan/
Ghazalba, M. A. (2020). Ideologi dan Hegemoni dalam Shalawatan (Study ff The Ideology of Althusser and Gramsci’s Hegemony). Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.15.1.105-117
Hutagalung, D. (2004). Hegemoni, Kekuasaan dan Ideologi. Jurnal Diponegoro, Vol. 6 (12). https://www.academia.edu/4149115/Hegemoni_Kekuasaan_dan_Ideologi
Inayah Wahid. (2024). Pernyataan Sikap Jaringan GUSDURian: Menolak Izin Tambang untuk Ormas Keagamaan - Kampung Gusdurian. https://gusdurian.net/2024/06/11/pernyataan-sikap-jaringan-gusdurian-menolak-izin-tambang-untuk-ormas-keagamaan/
Khoirurrijal, K. (2017). ISLAM NUSANTARA SEBAGAI COUNTER HEGEMONI MELAWAN RADIKALISME AGAMA DI INDONESIA. Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 22(1), Article 1. (National). https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v22i1.616
Magfur, A., Husnul, M., & Hasan, A. (2024). Pertambangan oleh Ormas dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (Analisis terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2024). Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i4.743
NU Online. (2015). PBNU Haramkan Eksploitasi Sumber Daya Alam di Indonesia. NU Online. https://nu.or.id/nasional/pbnu-haramkan-eksploitasi-sumber-daya-alam-di-indonesia-CyKqd
NU Online. (2024a). Ketua PBNU: Kritik soal Konsesi Tambang adalah Sesuatu yang Baik. NU Online. https://nu.or.id/nasional/ketua-pbnu-kritik-soal-konsesi-tambang-adalah-sesuatu-yang-baik-m3E9L
NU Online. (2024b). Ketua Umum PBNU Angkat Bicara soal Konsesi Tambang untuk Ormas Keagamaan. NU Online. https://nu.or.id/nasional/ketua-umum-pbnu-angkat-bicara-soal-konsesi-tambang-untuk-ormas-keagamaan-RXbOF
Patmah, N., & Mayrudin, Y. M. (2025). Diskursif Politik Lingkungan dan Relasi Aktor dalam Kerusakan Lingkungan di Kabupaten Lebak, Banten. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 10(2), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v10i2.4696
PP No. 25. (2024). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/286980/pp-no-25-tahun-2024
Prastika, A., Putri, M. F. I., & Tasya, V. N. (2024). Urgensi Pemberian Izin Pengelolaan Tambang bagi Organisasi Kemasyarakatan ‘Keagamaan’ di Indonesia: Analisis Regulasi dalam PP Nomor 25 Tahun 2024. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 2(02), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i02.216
Rahman, P. (2018). Implementasi Undang—Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 Pasal 74 Tentang Corporate Social Responsibility Dalam Upaya Pengembangan Masyarakat Sekitar Pada PT. Semen Baturaja Persero Tbk Site Baturaja Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ulu (OKU) Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v3i2.667
Roger Simon. (1999). Gagasan-Gagasan Politik Gramsci (Kamdani & Imam Baehaqi, Trans.). Insist Press dan Pustaka Pelajar.
Saiyfuddin, F. (2024, August 8). Absurditas Pertambangan Ramah Lingkungan—Kampung Gusdurian. https://gusdurian.net/2024/08/08/absurditas-pertambangan-ramah-lingkungan/
Salam, A. (2021). Hegemonic Formation in Post-Javanese Indonesian Society. Humaniora, 33(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.69793
Saturi, S. (2024). Mestinya NU Awasi Tambang dan Dampingi Korban, Bukan jadi Pengelola. Mongabay.Co.Id. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2024/06/27/mestinya-nu-awasi-tambang-dan-dampingi-korban-bukan-jadi-pengelola/
Siswati, E. (2017). ANATOMI TEORI HEGEMONI ANTONIO GRAMSCI. Translitera : Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35457/translitera.v5i1.355







