People, Justice, and Legitimacy: A Philosophical Review of Sovereignty from the Perspective of John Rawls
Rakyat, Keadilan, dan Legitimasi: Tinjauan Filosofis atas Kedaulatan Perspektif John Rawls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v11i3.7166Keywords:
People's Sovereignty, John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, Public Reason, Social PhilosophyAbstract
Objective: To analyze the relevance of John Rawls's social philosophy, specifically justice as fairness and public reason, as a philosophical foundation for the substantive implementation of the concept of popular sovereignty. This study maps the conceptual correspondence between Rawls's two ideas and the four core principles of popular sovereignty, namely the principles of liberty, justice, majority rule, and accountability.
Methodology: This study employs library research with a socio-political philosophy approach, encompassing four stages.
Findings: Justice as fairness represents the principles of liberty and justice in popular sovereignty through Rawls's two main principles of justice: the guarantee of equal basic liberties for every individual, and the arrangement of social and economic inequalities to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged. Meanwhile, public reason represents the principles of majority rule and accountability by emphasizing that every public decision must be grounded in a collective rationality that embodies the principle of reciprocity and remains accountable to all citizens.
Implications: Policy formulation that goes beyond the mere will of the majority by integrating the principle of reciprocity to protect the basic rights of all citizens; furthermore, public reason can serve as a basis for advocacy to ensure that citizen participation is not merely procedural, but also substantive and accountable.
Originality: Enriches the understanding of popular sovereignty, shifting it from a mere political procedure into a value system rooted in fundamental liberty and the substantive distribution of justice, while simultaneously providing a critical contribution to the development of deliberative democracy theory.
References
Apaut, Yosep Copertino. (2026). Konsep Kedaulatan Rakyat dan Batasan Kekuasaan Negara Dalam Kerangka Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Hukum, 3(1), 88–103. https://ejournal.lumbungpare.org/index.php/sainmikum/article/view/1484
Aqillah, Salsabila Syahlaa, Azzahra, Raisha Puti, Destiaman, Ananda, & Arvianti, Fitri Nova. (2025). Liberalisme vs Komunitarianisme: Perdebatan tentang Hak Individu dan Konsep Komunal. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(01). http://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/943
Bakker, Anton, & Zubair, Achmad Charris. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat.
Burnyeat, Gwen, & Sheild Johansson, Miranda. (2022). An anthropology of the social contract: The political power of an idea. Critique of Anthropology, 42(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X221120168
Costea, Bogdan. (2011). Diversity, Uniqueness, and Images. Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization, 333.
Damayanti, Cicilia. (2025). Kesetaraan, Keadilan, Dan Kapabilitas: Membangun Fondasi Politik Inklusif Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural Indonesia Berdasarkan Pemikiran Filosofis Martha Nussbaum. Gita Sang Surya, 20(3), 23–33. https://gss.jpicofmindonesia.org/gss-jul-sep-2025/
EIU. (2024). Democracy Index 2024. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2024/
Flores, Imer B. (2025). The Democratic Principle and the Tyranny of the Majority. In Contemporary Facets of Injustice (pp. 95–110). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93783-5_7
Handayani, Intan, Syara, Salira Niti, Garnita, Sarassati, & Fisailillah, Laika. (2025). John Rawls: Filsafat Hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(01). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/972
Jamnik, Anton. (2022). Rawls’ Theory of Justice as Fairness as Foundation and Challenge for Local Self-Government. Lex Localis: Journal of Local Self-Government, 20(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4335/20.3.641-665(2022)
Karnein, Anja. (2022). Rawls and The Future: On the Possibility of Cooperation Across Time. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 50(3), 271–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12213
Koliba, Christopher. (2025). Liberal Democratic Accountability Standards and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 85(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13831
Leback, K. (2012). Teori-Teori Keadilan; Analisis Kritis terhadap Pemikiran JS Mill, John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Reinhold Niebuhr, Jose Porfirio Miranda. Bandung, Indonesia: Nusa Media.
Lister, Andrew. (2023). Contractualist Alternatives to The Veil of Ignorance. Journal of Political Philosophy, 31(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12292
Luppi, Roberto. (2025). Public Reason and Injustice: Analysing Rawls’ and Habermas’ Requirements for the Introduction of Religious Arguments into Public Discourse. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, rwaf002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaf002
Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong. (2022). Konsep Liberalisme Politik John Rawls sebagai Jawaban terhadap Tantangan Masyarakat Plural dan Kritik Atasnya. Diskursus-Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi Stf Driyarkara, 18(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v18i2.327
Marslathifah, Ailsa Nur, Rahayu, Asri Sukma Noer, & Damayanti, Sri. (2025). Keadilan Distributif dan Ketimpangan Sosial dalam Kebijakan Kenaikan Tunjangan DPR. Equality: Law and Social, 1(2), 75–79. https://ejournal.risetanakbangsa.id/jhs/article/view/53
Maurya, Sooraj Kumar. (2022). On Just, Justice and Distributive Justice: A Critical and Comparative Discourse. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 8(2), 240–254. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1047368
Mladenović, Ivan. (2022). Considerations on Democracy in Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. Prolegomena: Časopis Za Filozofiju, 21(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26362/20220102
Nusantara, Rian Hidayatulloh Garuda, & Harahap, Nadhif Tanzil Haikal. (2025). Filsafat Hukum Dan Keadilan Sosial: Analisis Teoritis Tentang Peran Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(01). http://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/929
Peruzzotti, Enrique. (2025). Social Accountability. In Understanding Accountability: New Perspectives on a Fractured World (pp. 193–210). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003457961
Rawls, John. (1993). The Law of Peoples. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/448700
Rawls, John. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1600311
Rawls, John. (1999). Collected Papers. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. (2011). A Theory of Justice Teori Keadilan Dasar–Dasar Filsafat Politik untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial Dalam Negara, ctk. Kedua. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Rawls, John. (2020). Political Liberalism. In The new social theory reader (pp. 123–128). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060963
Rugian, Fernando Eugenio, Niode, Burhan Niode, & Tulung, Trilke Erita. (2022). Dinamika Kehidupan Demokrasi Di Myanmar (Suatu Studi Tentang Pengalihan Kekuasaan Oleh Militer Di Tahun 2021). Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v7i2.2105
Suseno, Franz Magnis. (1991a). Etika politik: Prinsip-prinsip moral dasar kenegaraan modern.
Suseno, Franz Magnis. (1991b). Etika politik: Prinsip-Prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern.
Tahzib, Collis. (2025). Whose Public Reason? Which Reasonableness? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 110(3), 1013–1030. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.70000
Ujan, Andre Ata. (2001). Keadilan dan Demokrasi: Telaah Filsafat Politik John Rawls. Kanisius.
Van der Walt, Johan. (2023). Rawls, Habermas and Liberal Democratic Law. Neth. J. Legal. Phil., 52, 16.
Wall, Illan, & Matthews, Daniel. (2024). Sovereignty and The Persistence of The Aesthetic. The Modern Law Review, 87(6), 1393–1421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12880
Weale, Albert. (2023). Equality and Social Policy. Routledge.
Weithman, Paul J. (2025). Public Deliberation, Public Reason, and Concern for Truth. The Review of Politics, 87(3), 346–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670525000026
Wilesmith, John. (2021). Why Size Matters: Property-owning Democracy, Liberal Socialism, and the Firm*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 29(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12230
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 104
/ PDF downloads: 92
