The Challenges for Indonesia’s Electoral Institution in Facing Cartelization and Oligarchs Politics

Tantangan Badan Pemilu Indonesia dalam Menghadapi era Kartelisasi dan Oligarki Politik

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v11i4.7535

Keywords:

Party Cartelization, Political Oligarchy, Electoral Governance, Accountability

Abstract

Purpose : This study aims to analyze how the interaction between party cartelization and political oligarchy operates within Indonesia’s electoral institutional structure, and how it affects the independence, accountability, and transparency of electoral management bodies (KPU and Bawaslu). Using the 2024 election as the case context, this study further seeks to formulate a collaborative accountability model to address these structural challenges.               

Design/methodology : This qualitative document-based case analysis draws on legal documents, institutional reports, civil society reports, and academic literature. Following Tracy’s qualitative research framework, the data were analyzed through interpretive thematic analysis within a political economy and power theory framework.

Findings : The analysis reveals that cartelization and oligarchy are institutionalized through exclusionary electoral thresholds, weak campaign finance accountability, politicized commissioner selection, and budgetary dependence. These mechanisms systematically erode the independence of electoral institutions and weaken oversight over complex electoral violations.

Practical Implication : The “Democratic Middle Way” model, operationalized through a Multi-Stakeholder Electoral Integrity Forum (F-MIP), offers a practical blueprint for collaborative electoral oversight without immediate statutory overhaul.

Originality/value : This article connects party cartelization, political oligarchy, and electoral governance, providing a collaborative accountability framework to strengthen electoral integrity in transitional democracies.

Paper type : Conceptual Paper

Author Biographies

Muhammad Rafi Fadilah, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

Rizki Maulidina Dewi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

References

Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Bunyamin, Bahri, R. A., & Murbani, A. W. (2025). Reforming Indonesia’s Electoral System: Legal and Policy Considerations. 8(1), 61–99. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.8.1.61-99

Arsyad, M., Natsir, S., & Abidin, D. (2025). The Analysis of Audit Procedures for 2024 Election Contestants ’ Campaign Fund Reports. American Journal of Open Research, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v4i7.200

Asnawi, Andriani, A. G., & Maulana, A. F. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum Yang Bersifat Terstruktur , Sistematis dan Masif. 3(3), 296–308.

Aspinall, E., Fossati, D., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2019). Elites, masses, and democratic decline in Indonesia. Democratization, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1680971

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s Democratic Paradox: Competitive Elections amidst Rising Illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412

Asrinaldi, Yusoff, M. A., & Karim, dan Z. A. (2022). Oligarchy in the Jokowi government and its influence on the implementation of legislative function in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121995564

Cahyono, A., Iftitah, A., Hidayatullah, A. R., Yuliastuti, E., & Susetiyo, W. (2023). ANALISIS KRITIS TERHADAP PENERAPAN PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLDDALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM 2024: PERSPEKTIF HUKUM NORMATIF DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Supremasi, 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.3041

Chandranegara, I. S., & Bakhri, S. (2023). DYSFUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATORY AND POST-ELECTION CORRUPTION. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1art13

Efendi, S., Anisah, Wara, M., & Trisiyah, N. O. (2023). Absolute Authority Of Bawaslu In Handling Election Violations Post The Determination Of The National Results. ISTIFHAM: Journal Of Islamic Studies, 1(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v1i2.20

Ham, C. Van, & Garnett, H. A. (2019). Building impartial electoral management? Institutional design, independence and electoral integrity. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119834573

Hidayaturrahman, M., Ngarawula, B., & Sadhana, K. (2020). Political investors : Political elite oligarchy and mastery of regional resources in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891120917213

James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2023a). Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance. South African Journal of International Affairs, 30(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2271496

James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2023b). Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance. South African Journal of International Affair, 30(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2271496

Karim, Z. A., & Hamil, J. H. (2022). CARTELISATION IN INDONESIAN POLITICS DURING THE JOKOWI ERA. JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 27(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol276no1.3

Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001

Kumara, Q. M. (2022). Pendanaan Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu (EMB). Jurnal Politik Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics), 8(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpi.v8i2.40622

Kurniawan, R. (2025). Patronage Networks and Power Disparities: The Legacy of Political Patronage in Indonesia’s Governance and Democracy. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 13(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v13i1a1

Mietzner, M. (2015). Dysfunction by Design: Political Finance and Corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991

Mietzner, M. (2020a). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Mietzner, M. (2020b). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Mietzner, M. (2024). Elite Collusion in Indonesia: How It Has Both Enabled and Limited Executive Aggrandizement. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 712(1), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162241309436

Nazril, M. M., Juliandi, D., Mabrury, D. R., & Sukti, S. (2024). Sinergi KPU, BAWASLU, dan DKPP: Pilar Penegakan Demokrasi dalam Pemilu Indonesia. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(4), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.524

Nugraha, D. P., Silalahi, J. B. I., & Silalahi, T. R. I. (2025). Reverse Mechanism Selection Sebagai Instrumen Rekonfigurasi Seleksi Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum: Menata Ulang Keterlibatan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Untuk Menjamin Kemandirian Dwi Putra Nugraha Thomas Rifera Indraputra Silalahi PENDAHULUAN Demokrasi modern. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 32(2), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art3

Nugroho, R. M., Sudarsono, Istislam, & Safa’at, M. A. (2022). The Presidential Candidacy Threshold in Indonesia and Its Implications. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(8), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i8.513

Nurfajila, E. F., & Hurriyah. (2024). Selection of KPU and Bawaslu Members: Fit and Proper Test in the Perspective of Election Law and Meritocracy. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 9(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v9i2.6293

Pepinsky, T. B. (2025). Cleavages, Institutions, and Democracy in Indonesia: The 2024 Elections in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 44(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251349467

Power, T. P. (2018). Jokowi’s authoritarian turn and Indonesia’s democratic decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1549918

Pradipta, A. M. (2025). The Position of Election Law in Ensuring Regional Political Justice and Stability. Journal of Law and Humanity Studies, 2(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.59613/vfzg8f05

Rahman, M. A. M., Luis, R. F., & Ruslie, A. S. (2023). Indonesia’s Presidential Threshold: An Analysis of Legal and Political Dynamics. Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia, 2(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v2i2.401

Sabrina, D. F., & Inder, B. (2024). Concentration of power in nomination of presidential candidates in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231199530

Sari, D. W. (2025). Audit Forensik sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Partai Politik: Komparisi Indonesia dan Nigeria. Delicti: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 2(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.25077/delicti.v.2.i.2.p.22-36.2024

Siambaton, K. H., Din, M., Akbar, F., & Mulyadi, M. (2025). Consequences of the Use of Political Money Crimes in Indonesian Election Administration. The Role of Digital Technology in Imporving the Efficiency and Quality of HR Management and Education in the Industrial Era 4.0, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.59188/icss.v4i1.233

Slater, D. (2018). PARTY CARTELIZATION, INDONESIAN-STYLE: PRESIDENTIAL POWER-SHARING AND THE CONTINGENCY OF DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18, 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.26

Subekti, D., & Wahid, M. (2023). The Political Parties Coalition Behavior in Election: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 8(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v8i3.3111

Tambunan, D. (2023). The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative process. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231159395

Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. In Revija za sociologiju (3rd ed., Vol. 43, Issue 1). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.43.1.6

Wahanisa, R., Riyanto, R. B., Syahwal, Mukminto, E., & Nnawulezi, U. (2025). From Justice to Politics : The Constitutional Court ’ s Role in Structured and Systematic Election Violations. Lex Scientia Law Review, 9(1), 1252–1284. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v9i1.21103

Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency and Popular Opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 41(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2k

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.

Wutoy, M., Waruwu, E., Ndraha, A. B., Hadad, A. Al, & Nurfurkon, A. (2022). Application of the Presidential Threshold Concept in the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Election System and its Impact on the Indonesian Constitutional System. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), 01(03), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.56982/journalo.v1i03.28

Yusuf, M., Nuryadin, Imran, Miftahuddin, Rahman, A., & Erham. (2025). The Position of the General Election Management Body in the Constitutional Structure of the Republic of Indonesia. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(3), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v9i3.11057

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

How to Cite

Fadilah, M. R., & Dewi, R. M. (2026). The Challenges for Indonesia’s Electoral Institution in Facing Cartelization and Oligarchs Politics: Tantangan Badan Pemilu Indonesia dalam Menghadapi era Kartelisasi dan Oligarki Politik. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 11(4), 1092–1111. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v11i4.7535

Issue

Section

Articles
external-statistic-user-interface-budi-arianto Abstract views: 36 / PDF downloads: 13