Reconstructing Golkar's Internal Democratization Model for the 2024 Regional Elections
Rekonstruksi Model Demokratisasi Internal Partai Golkar dalam Seleksi Kandidat Pilkada 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v11i4.7696Keywords:
candidate selection, Golkar Party, internal party democracy, institutional reconstructionAbstract
Purpose: This article reconstructs an implementable model of internal democratization for Golkar's regional-head candidate selection by converting empirical weaknesses into institutional safeguards.
Design/Methodology/Approach: An explanatory qualitative case study was conducted across the gubernatorial and six regency/municipal election arenas in Gorontalo Province during the 2024 simultaneous regional elections. Data from eight purposively selected informants, party and election documents, official digital records, and verified news were analyzed through process tracing, thematic coding, and source triangulation.
Findings: Candidate selection was institutionally organized but democratically uneven: candidacy began mainly through assignments, member participation was stronger during mobilization than selection, survey data were not fully accessible, accountability flowed upward, and the final recommendation remained concentrated at the central level. Across four arenas for which the assignment-to-final-candidacy trajectory is explicitly traceable in the evidence reported here, three involved repositioning or substitution and one showed continuity. These findings ground the DIALOGIS-GOLKAR model, which combines layered selectorates, open nomination, integrity thresholds, merit assessment, member deliberation, audited surveys, mandate-based coalition bargaining, reasoned joint ratification, and an internal objection mechanism.
Practical Implications: Golkar can pilot the model in phased form by institutionalizing six minimum safeguards—open nomination, an independent merit-and-integrity panel, member deliberation, audited surveys, reasoned center-region ratification, and an internal objection channel—then evaluate compliance, representation, member acceptance, post-selection cohesion, and electoral performance.
Originality/Value: The article shifts internal-party democracy research from diagnosis toward an evidence-based institutional design that balances member sovereignty, local knowledge, organizational cohesion, and electability.
References
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aylott, N., & Bolin, N. (2023). Shifting perceptions of intra-party democracy: Leader selection in the Swedish Liberal Party. Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 1070269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1070269
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Bloquet, C., Borucki, I., & Höhne, B. (2022). Digitalization in candidate selection: Support and resistance within established political parties in Germany. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 815513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.815513
Borz, G., & Janda, K. (2020). Contemporary trends in party organization: Revisiting intra-party democracy. Party Politics, 26(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818754605
Budi, A. (2020). Less democracy, more centralism: The selection of candidates by Golkar and PDIP in Indonesian subnational executive elections, 2005-2020. Asian Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1774909
Caiani, M., Padoan, E., & Marino, B. (2022). Candidate selection, personalization and different logics of centralization in new Southern European populism: The cases of Podemos and the M5S. Government and Opposition, 57(3), 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.9
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Ghafur, J. (2023). Demokratisasi internal partai politik era reformasi: Antara das sollen dan das sein. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art1
Höhne, B. (2023). How democracy works within a populist party: Candidate selection in the Alternative for Germany. Government and Opposition, 58(3), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.33
Indonesia, R. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik. Republik Indonesia.
Islam, N., & Suryani, E. I. (2026). Dynamics of PKS internal cadre nominations in the 2024 Bandar Lampung City regional elections. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 11(3), 849–865. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v11i3.7086
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Provinsi Gorontalo. (2025). Pengumuman Nomor 36/PL.02.7-Pu/75/2025 tentang Penetapan Pasangan Calon Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Gorontalo Terpilih dalam Pemilihan Tahun 2024.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism (4th ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Power, T., & Warburton, E. (Eds.). (2020). Democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression? ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814881524
Prianto, A. L. (2025). Smoke-filled room and secret garden of politics: How do candidate selection as rational choice in local head of government election? Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 7(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v7i1.1879
Rahat, G., & Hazan, R. Y. (2001). Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework. Party Politics, 7(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003003
Reidy, T. (2022). Forwards-backwards: Internal party democracy in Irish political parties. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 850607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.850607
Sánchez Medero, G. (2024). Digital models for the selection of party organs and election candidates in Spanish political parties: The impact of intraparty democracy. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1442331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1442331
Tatawu, G., Mufakhir, L. O. A., Patuju, L., Khabiirun, Samiel, E., & Zumail, L. O. (2025). Decentralization of political parties to improve internal party democracy in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(12), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i12.3012
Umum, K. P. (2024). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2024 tentang pencalonan gubernur dan wakil gubernur, bupati dan wakil bupati, serta wali kota dan wakil wali kota. Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia.
Vandeleene, A., & Van Haute, É. (2021). A comparative analysis of selection criteria of candidates in Belgium. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 777747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.777747
Wicaksono, A. T. (2023). Problematika dan upaya perwujudan demokratisasi kelembagaan internal partai politik. Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial, 3(2), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.15642/sosyus.v3i2.542
Wolkenstein, F. (2016). A Deliberative Model of Intra‐Party Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(3), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12064
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 20
/ PDF downloads: 16
